As I sit here pondering the iconic Star Trek: The Original Series, my mind wanders back to the ongoing debate surrounding the show's releases. With the original effects versions, the remastered versions, and everything in between, it's clear that the nuances of this beloved franchise have become a contentious topic among fans.
For those who may be unfamiliar, let me break down the key points: the original series was first released on DVD with the "original effects" version, which featured the classic stock footage from the 1960s. However, these early releases were marred by technical issues, such as glitches in the transitions and a sound mix that was more akin to a broadcast mono track than a premium home video experience.
In response to these criticisms, Paramount released the remastered versions on Blu-ray, which boasted sleeker, more vibrant visuals and an improved sound mix. But here's the thing: these new releases aren't simply upgraded versions of the originals; they're reimagined productions that have altered the very fabric of our beloved show.
One of the most significant changes is the alteration of the second pilot episode, "Where No Man Has Gone Before." In its original form, this episode featured no voice-over narration, a decision that has been deemed sacrilegious by some fans. The new remastered version, on the other hand, includes a narration track that alters the tone and narrative flow of the episode.
Now, I'm not here to bash the remastered versions or imply that they're inferior to their predecessors. But as a viewer, it's essential to consider the implications of these changes. By introducing narration into this iconic episode, Paramount has effectively sanitized the experience for new audiences, removing a crucial aspect of the original story.
It's also worth noting that fans who have grown up with the remastered versions may never experience the show in its original form. The nostalgia factor is real here; many viewers who grew up watching TOS on TV are now revisiting the series on Blu-ray, where they're presented with a new and improved version of their favorite episodes.
As I reflect on this debate, I'm reminded of the power of cinema to shape our perceptions and experiences. Star Trek: The Original Series may seem like a relic of the past, but its influence can be seen in countless other shows and films that have followed in its footsteps.
Ultimately, whether you prefer the original effects versions or the remastered releases, it's essential to acknowledge the craftsmanship and artistry that goes into each iteration. Whether you're a die-hard fan or a casual observer, TOS remains an incredible achievement in storytelling, with a legacy that continues to captivate audiences today.
So, as I conclude this piece, I leave you with a question: what is your preferred version of Star Trek: The Original Series? Do you cherish the original effects, or do you prefer the remastered releases? Let's discuss in the comments below!
---
**Harper Quinn's Verdict:** 4.5/5 stars (Original Effects Version)
While I appreciate the technical improvements and visual enhancements of the remastered versions, I still prefer the original effects for their raw, unbridled energy. There's something special about experiencing TOS in its purest form, with all its quirks and flaws intact.
**Harper Quinn's Verdict:** 4/5 stars (Remastered Version)
While the remastered releases are undoubtedly superior in terms of technical quality, I worry that they may have compromised the original spirit of the show. The narration track in "Where No Man Has Gone Before" is a prime example of this – it feels like an affront to the very essence of TOS.
**Harper Quinn's Verdict:** 5/5 stars (A Mixed Bag)
As with any film, the quality of the release depends on individual perspectives. For some viewers, the remastered versions may be a revelation, while others will continue to cherish their original effects. I, for one, appreciate the diversity of options available, and I encourage fans to explore both versions to find what resonates with them.
---
Stay tuned for more movie reviews and analysis from Harper Quinn!
Sources:- [
What the the best version of the original series that is ... - The Trek …] (
https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/what-the-the-best-version-of-the-original-series-that-is-actual-original-not-enhanced.314567/)
- [
The Trek BBS] (
https://www.trekbbs.com/)
- [
Dvd and Blu-ray release comparison - The Trek BBS] (
https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/dvd-and-blu-ray-release-comparison.293089/)
- [
TOS Nielsen Ratings Season 1 - The Trek BBS] (
https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/tos-nielsen-ratings-season-1.315854/)
- [
FAVORITE SPOCK QUOTES FROM TOS - The Trek BBS] (
https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/favorite-spock-quotes-from-tos.304421/)
- [
Costuming - TOS Boots - The Trek BBS] (
https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/costuming-tos-boots.238261/)
- [
Which Show Replaced TOS on NBC's Schedule? - The Trek BBS] (
https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/which-show-replaced-tos-on-nbcs-schedule.301598/)
- [
Star Trek having a cheap / low budget a misnomer? | The Trek BBS] (
https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/star-trek-having-a-cheap-low-budget-a-misnomer.318410/)
- [
The Original Series - non-'remastered' version on DVD? - The Trek …] (
https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/the-original-series-non-remastered-version-on-dvd.273679/)
- [
Star Trek Viewing Order List - The Trek BBS] (
https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/star-trek-viewing-order-list.311873/)